Cameroonian lawyer Emmanuel Simh openly backs Issa Tchiroma, calling him the “useful vote” and pledging to campaign for him ahead of the presidential race. Emmanuel Simh’s Bold Declaration The Cameroonian political landscape has been shaken by the declaration of Me Emmanuel Simh, a prominent lawyer and political figure, who announced his support for Issa Tchiroma Bakary. In a strong statement, Simh described Tchiroma as the “vote utile” (useful vote), stressing that he will not only cast his ballot in his favor but also actively campaign for him in the upcoming presidential election. This declaration marks a significant shift, given Simh’s long history as a supporter of opposition causes. His decision to rally behind Tchiroma is seen as a move that could influence both public opinion and political alliances in the months ahead. Why Issa Tchiroma? By calling Tchiroma the “useful vote,” Emmanuel Simh is essentially positioning him as the most strategic candidate in the current political climate. The term implies that, in Simh’s view, voting for Tchiroma increases the chances of achieving real political impact, compared to other opposition figures who may not have the same reach or influence. For Simh, the choice reflects not only political calculations but also pragmatism—a recognition that Cameroon’s complex political terrain requires a candidate capable of building alliances and appealing to broader demographics. The Impact on Opposition Politics Simh’s endorsement has sparked debate across Cameroon’s political scene. The Cameroon Renaissance Movement (MRC), previously seen as one of Simh’s platforms, now faces questions about its ability to retain prominent supporters. With Simh’s high-profile support shifting toward Tchiroma, the dynamics of opposition politics could change significantly. This move may consolidate Tchiroma’s position as a serious contender, while also challenging the unity of other opposition coalitions. Issa Tchiroma’s Strategy Issa Tchiroma, known for his long political career and controversial stances, has positioned himself as a pragmatic figure capable of navigating Cameroon’s polarized environment. Gaining the support of Emmanuel Simh strengthens his image as a candidate of choice for those seeking both influence and credibility. Observers note that Tchiroma’s campaign could benefit greatly from Simh’s legal expertise, political networks, and ability to mobilize activists on the ground. Reactions and Controversy Not everyone has welcomed this endorsement. Critics argue that Tchiroma has a checkered political past, often accused of shifting allegiances. Some fear that Simh’s support may undermine broader opposition unity, making it harder to challenge the ruling establishment. However, supporters insist that this is a strategic calculation, one that prioritizes winning over symbolism. For them, Simh’s words resonate with voters who want to back a candidate with the best chance of success. Conclusion Emmanuel Simh’s decision to back Issa Tchiroma and call him the “useful vote” is a powerful statement in the unfolding drama of Cameroon’s presidential race. By promising to vote and campaign for him, Simh has shifted the spotlight onto Tchiroma, raising questions about how this endorsement will reshape alliances and strategies in the run-up to the election. One thing is certain: this announcement has added new energy—and controversy—to Cameroon’s political debate.

The Cameroonian political scene heats up as questions arise over who will be the next to follow Issa Tchiroma after Emmanuel Simh’s decision to distance himself. Political Shifts Within the MRC The Cameroon Renaissance Movement (MRC) continues to face internal turbulence as alliances shift and leaders reconsider their positions. After lawyer Emmanuel Simh’s recent decision to withdraw his support, speculation is mounting over who will follow Issa Tchiroma in distancing themselves from the party’s strategies. This moment raises key questions about loyalty, political survival, and the broader challenges of maintaining cohesion within an opposition movement that has often been under pressure from both internal disputes and external political dynamics. Emmanuel Simh’s Withdrawal Emmanuel Simh, a respected lawyer and political figure, has long been viewed as one of the pillars of the MRC’s legal and political strategy. His decision to take a step back from the party’s activities has therefore sparked discussions about deeper rifts within the movement. Observers note that Simh’s departure may reflect frustration with leadership decisions, campaign direction, or alliances that he may not fully support. For many, his move signals a turning point that could influence other party members to reconsider their positions. Issa Tchiroma’s Controversial Role At the center of these discussions is Issa Tchiroma Bakary, a seasoned political actor who has often been criticized for his shifting alliances and bold statements. His trajectory has made him both a divisive and influential figure in Cameroon’s political scene. As Emmanuel Simh steps back, attention turns to Tchiroma’s stance and whether his example will inspire other MRC members or affiliates to follow suit, potentially deepening the party’s challenges ahead of the 2025 presidential race. Impact on the MRC’s Unity The MRC, led by Maurice Kamto, has positioned itself as one of the main opposition forces in Cameroon. However, episodes like Simh’s withdrawal and the debates surrounding Issa Tchiroma highlight the fragility of political alliances within the movement. Unity has long been a challenge for the opposition, with divergent strategies on how best to confront the ruling party. Some advocate for broad coalitions, while others fear that compromising alliances could dilute the MRC’s message of change and reform. What Comes Next? The key question remains: who will be next? Will other prominent members or allies of the MRC decide to distance themselves as the campaign season intensifies? Or will the party succeed in holding its ranks together and presenting a united front to Cameroonian voters? Political analysts suggest that the coming months will be crucial in determining the MRC’s ability to project stability and cohesion. Without that, the party risks losing momentum to other opposition groups or even reinforcing the dominance of the ruling establishment. Conclusion The departure of Emmanuel Simh has triggered speculation and uncertainty within the MRC. With Issa Tchiroma’s political role also under scrutiny, the question now is whether more figures will follow the same path. For Cameroonian voters, these shifts are a reminder of the fluid and often unpredictable nature of political alliances in the country. As the election approaches, the stakes are higher than ever for parties trying to balance unity with strategy.

Cameroonian politician Abel Elimbi Lobe announces he is withdrawing support for Akere Muna following Muna’s decision to align with Bello Bouba Maigari. A Political Shift The 2025 presidential campaign in Cameroon has taken another dramatic turn. Political figure Abel Elimbi Lobe has declared that he is officially withdrawing his support for Akere Muna, citing the latter’s decision to align with veteran politician Bello Bouba Maigari. The announcement adds a new layer of complexity to an already dynamic political landscape, where alliances and rivalries continue to shape the strategies of opposition candidates. Why Elimbi Lobe Made His Decision In his public statement, Abel Elimbi Lobe expressed disappointment over Akere Muna’s rapprochement with Bello Bouba Maigari. According to him, this political move runs counter to the ideals he expected Muna to uphold as a candidate for change and renewal. “I cannot support a candidate who chooses to align with forces that, in my view, do not represent the political transformation our country needs,” Elimbi Lobe said. This clear break highlights the tensions and disagreements within the opposition camp regarding strategy, alliances, and the best path forward to challenge the ruling party. Implications for Akere Muna’s Campaign Akere Muna’s recent decision to step aside from his presidential bid and endorse Bello Bouba Maigari was initially seen as a move to unify opposition voices and avoid splitting the vote. However, Elimbi Lobe’s withdrawal of support shows that not all allies see the alliance in a positive light. For Muna, the loss of Elimbi Lobe’s backing could weaken his credibility among some segments of the electorate, particularly those who had looked to his candidacy as a fresh alternative. Bello Bouba at the Center of Attention Bello Bouba Maigari, a seasoned political actor with decades of experience, finds himself at the heart of these shifting dynamics. While the endorsement by Akere Muna boosts his campaign, it simultaneously creates friction within the broader opposition movement. Supporters argue that Bello Bouba’s experience and national network make him a strong candidate, but critics—like Elimbi Lobe—fear that his political legacy may not represent the change Cameroon’s younger generation is demanding. Broader Political Landscape The episode reflects a deeper challenge facing Cameroon’s opposition: how to build unity without sacrificing principles. As alliances form and dissolve, voters may grow skeptical of political maneuvering and demand more clarity on candidates’ visions for governance, democracy, and development. Analysts suggest that such shifts could either fragment the opposition further or force candidates to rethink their strategies in order to maintain credibility and win public trust. Conclusion Abel Elimbi Lobe’s withdrawal of support for Akere Muna underscores the fragile nature of political alliances in Cameroon’s presidential race. While Akere Muna hoped his alignment with Bello Bouba Maigari would strengthen the opposition, it has also cost him valuable support. As the 2025 election approaches, these dynamics reveal the delicate balance between unity and division within the opposition—and how every decision can reshape the path to power.

Me Akere Muna a annoncé son retrait de la présidentielle 2025 au Cameroun et déclare désormais soutenir Bello Bouba Maigari. Une décision stratégique qui pourrait changer l’équilibre politique. Un tournant dans la campagne présidentielle La course à la présidentielle 2025 au Cameroun connaît un nouveau rebondissement. L’avocat et homme politique Me Akere Muna, candidat déclaré depuis plusieurs mois, a annoncé son retrait officiel de la compétition. Plus surprenant encore, il a déclaré apporter son soutien à Bello Bouba Maigari, figure politique chevronnée et président de l’Union nationale pour la démocratie et le progrès (UNDP). Cette décision, rendue publique lors d’une conférence de presse à Yaoundé, a immédiatement attiré l’attention des analystes et de l’opinion publique, tant par son timing que par ses implications électorales. Les raisons d’un retrait Selon Me Akere Muna, son choix s’inscrit dans une volonté de privilégier l’unité et de renforcer les chances de l’opposition face au parti au pouvoir. Il a affirmé que « l’intérêt supérieur du Cameroun doit passer avant les ambitions personnelles ». En rejoignant Bello Bouba Maigari, il espère contribuer à la formation d’un front plus solide capable de fédérer les électeurs autour d’un projet commun. Cette stratégie de rassemblement est vue par certains comme une tentative de maximiser les voix et d’éviter la dispersion qui affaiblit traditionnellement l’opposition camerounaise. Bello Bouba Maigari, le grand bénéficiaire ? Bello Bouba Maigari, ancien Premier ministre et candidat de longue date aux élections présidentielles, sort incontestablement renforcé par ce ralliement. Le soutien d’Akere Muna, personnalité respectée tant sur le plan national qu’international, apporte à sa candidature un supplément de crédibilité et de visibilité. Ce rapprochement pourrait aussi permettre d’attirer une partie de l’électorat jeune et urbain qui voyait en Akere Muna une alternative moderne, tout en consolidant l’assise régionale et historique de Bello Bouba. Réactions et enjeux politiques Dans le camp des partisans d’Akere Muna, la nouvelle a suscité des réactions partagées. Certains saluent un geste patriotique et courageux, tandis que d’autres expriment leur déception de voir leur candidat préféré se retirer. Du côté du pouvoir, ce rapprochement est observé avec attention. Si l’impact électoral reste difficile à mesurer, il est certain que cette décision modifie les équilibres de la campagne et pourrait contraindre les autres forces d’opposition à reconsidérer leurs stratégies. Vers une recomposition politique ? Ce retrait marque une étape importante dans le processus électoral. Il illustre également la nécessité pour les candidats de trouver des alliances afin de peser face à un système politique dominé depuis des décennies par le même parti. Reste à voir si ce ralliement sera suivi par d’autres mouvements de coalition ou s’il restera un cas isolé. Dans tous les cas, la présidentielle 2025 au Cameroun s’annonce plus incertaine que jamais.

Ukraine endured one of the most devastating aerial attacks of the war in late September 2025, when Russia launched a massive 12-hour barrage of drones and missiles across multiple regions, including the capital Kyiv. The strikes, which Kyiv officials described as the largest combined assault in months, left at least four civilians dead and dozens injured, including a 12-year-old girl. A Relentless Assault According to Ukraine’s air force, Russia unleashed nearly 500 drones and more than 40 missiles in waves designed to overwhelm defenses. Air raid sirens echoed across the country as Ukrainian air defense systems worked continuously through the night to intercept incoming threats. While many drones and missiles were successfully shot down, several still penetrated the shield, causing destruction to homes, schools, and infrastructure. In Kyiv alone, emergency crews battled fires in residential areas and evacuated families from damaged apartment blocks. Officials also reported power outages in several districts following strikes on energy facilities. In Zaporizhzhia, explosions damaged warehouses and disrupted transportation links. Zelenskyy’s Sharp Rebuke President Volodymyr Zelenskyy condemned the onslaught, calling it a “vile and cowardly” act of terror against civilians. In a national address, he accused Moscow of deliberately targeting non-military areas to spread fear and destabilize daily life. “Russia cannot break Ukraine’s spirit with such cowardly attacks,” Zelenskyy declared. “Every missile, every drone only strengthens our determination and the unity of our allies.” He also renewed calls for international partners to accelerate the delivery of air defense systems and long-range weapons to help Ukraine counter the ongoing threat. NATO and Regional Response The attacks did not only alarm Ukraine. Neighboring Poland scrambled fighter jets after Russian drones were detected approaching its border, raising fears of spillover. NATO issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to defend member states and warned Moscow against testing the alliance’s resolve. Estonia, which recently faced its own Russian airspace violations, called the bombardment proof that Moscow’s aggression is escalating beyond Ukraine. Calls have intensified within NATO to bolster Operation Eastern Sentry, the alliance’s mission to strengthen air defenses in Eastern Europe. Human Cost and Resilience Behind the numbers and military strategies lies the human toll. Families in Kyiv spent the night in bomb shelters, children slept underground, and elderly residents were carried to safety by rescue teams. Despite exhaustion, Ukrainians showed resilience—volunteers handed out food, and medics worked tirelessly to treat the injured. International aid agencies have already mobilized to provide assistance in affected regions, while local communities begin rebuilding damaged schools and homes. What This Means Going Forward The scale of this 12-hour attack signals Russia’s continued reliance on drone and missile warfare to pressure Ukraine and its allies. For Kyiv, it highlights the urgency of securing stronger Western support, particularly advanced defense systems. For NATO, the assault underscores the risk of escalation and the importance of reinforcing collective security. As Zelenskyy warned, Ukraine’s fight is not only for its survival but also for the stability of Europe as a whole.

What’s Happening In late September 2025, tension between NATO and Russia escalated after multiple airspace breaches. Estonia, among NATO’s eastern flank members, reported that three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets entered Estonian airspace near Vaindloo Island in the Gulf of Finland for about 12 minutes, without filing flight plans, operating transponders, or communicating with Estonian air traffic control. Al Jazeera+2Reuters+2 Earlier in the month, NATO also faced incursions in Poland when Russian drones were shot down after violating Polish airspace. AP News+2Reuters+2 These incidents have alarmed many in the alliance, raising concerns about both deterrence and how to respond to what some see as deliberate provocations. AP News+2euronews+2 NATO’s Response Why It’s Significant What to Watch Moving Forward

In one of the deadliest aerial onslaughts since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion, Ukraine was struck by a massive 12-hour bombardment overnight—one that President Volodymyr Zelenskyy denounced as “vile and cowardly.” The Guardian+1 The Assault: Scope & Impact According to Ukrainian officials, Russia deployed nearly 600 drones along with over 40 missiles across multiple fronts, including the capital Kyiv and regions such as Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Sumy, Chernihiv, and Odesa. The Guardian+2Financial Times+2 Though Ukraine’s air defenses intercepted many of the threats, the attack still resulted in tragic losses: at least four civilians were killed—including a 12-year-old girl—and dozens were injured. The Guardian+2The Washington Post+2 One of the casualties was a child crushed by a falling slab in Kyiv, while others included a nurse and patient hit in a cardiology institute. The Guardian+1 In Kyiv’s Petropavlivska Borshchahivka district, a missile struck a residential street, destroying roofs and windows, leaving survivors scrambling amid thick smoke and debris. The Guardian+2Financial Times+2 Zelenskyy’s Response: Calls for Action President Zelenskyy didn’t mince words. In a post on Telegram, he called the attacks “vile and cowardly”, framing them as deliberate terror targeting civilians. The Guardian+1 He urged the international community to step up pressure on Moscow by cutting off its energy revenues and increasing military support for Ukraine. The Guardian+2Financial Times+2 “There is no doubt that Russia wants to continue fighting and killing,” Zelenskyy said, claiming that the Kremlin benefits from prolonging the conflict so long as energy funds keep flowing. The Guardian+1 He also warned of the danger of escalation beyond Ukraine’s borders, suggesting Russia may be preparing to extend its aggression into Europe. The Guardian+1 International Reaction & Strategic Risks Leaders from the UK, Finland, and other nations strongly condemned the strikes. Britain promised to increase support for Kyiv, while Finland pushed for even tougher sanctions on Russia. The Guardian Poland scrambled jets and placed its airspace on high alert in response to the bombardment. Financial Times+2The Washington Post+2 The scale of the attack also triggered concern among NATO allies, especially as the use of drones and missiles blurs conventional battle lines. Financial Times+1 Russia defended the operation, claiming its targets were military. It denied any intention to strike NATO states or provoke a wider war. The Guardian+1 Why This Matters