Explore the key reasons analysts and citizens think Issa Tchiroma Bakary has a real chance in Cameroon’s 2025 elections — from his political experience to his reform message and grassroots appeal. As Cameroon approaches the 2025 presidential elections, the political landscape is beginning to shift. Among the candidates generating serious discussion is Issa Tchiroma Bakary, a long-serving politician whose latest move to position himself as the “candidate of transition” has stirred national interest. While no outcome is guaranteed, many observers believe that Tchiroma has a real chance to perform strongly — even possibly win. Here’s why. 1. Deep Political Experience and Credibility Issa Tchiroma Bakary’s decades in government make him one of the most experienced candidates in the race. He has served under multiple administrations in high-profile ministries, including Transport, Employment, and Communication.This long service gives him credibility in governance and a clear understanding of Cameroon’s political machinery. Supporters argue that his knowledge of both the government and opposition landscapes positions him as a bridge-builder who could manage the country’s complex transition period effectively. 2. Message of Reform and Transition Tchiroma’s campaign message — “Time for Transition” — has resonated with citizens who desire peaceful change but fear instability. He promises a revised electoral code, two-round presidential elections, term limits, and a gradual move toward federalism.These are reforms many Cameroonians have been demanding for years. His ability to express change in moderate, practical terms — not radical — appeals to voters looking for evolution rather than revolution. 3. Strong Base in the North and Beyond Coming from the North, Tchiroma has a strong ethnic and regional foundation in Garoua and surrounding areas. Yet, his political connections and national media presence have also built recognition in other parts of the country.By promoting unity, peace, and inclusiveness, he seeks to reach voters across Cameroon’s linguistic and cultural lines. His northern roots may provide a solid core of support in a potential multi-candidate election where regional loyalties often play a decisive role. 4. A Skilled Communicator As a former government spokesperson, Tchiroma has mastered the art of communication. He speaks with clarity and conviction, whether defending a policy or presenting his vision.In a country where messaging and media exposure are crucial, his eloquence and confidence set him apart. Many view him as one of the few politicians who can handle tough interviews and speak directly to both urban elites and rural voters. 5. Voter Fatigue with the Status Quo Perhaps the most important factor in Tchiroma’s potential success is the public mood. After decades of near-unchanged leadership, many Cameroonians express fatigue with the status quo.If he manages to position himself as both experienced and different enough from the current system, he could become the compromise candidate — trusted to bring change without chaos. Challenges to Overcome Despite these strengths, Tchiroma faces challenges: skepticism over his long association with the ruling establishment, questions about whether his reforms are realistic, and competition from younger, more populist candidates. To win, he must convince undecided voters that his transformation from insider to reformer is genuine. Conclusion Issa Tchiroma Bakary’s combination of experience, reform message, communication skill, and regional influence makes him one of the most interesting figures in Cameroon’s 2025 race. While no prediction is certain, his campaign embodies a possibility many voters quietly hope for — a transition toward renewal through stability, led by someone who knows both the old system and the need for change.

Explore why Issa Tchiroma Bakary has been called “the good devil” by some Cameroonians. Discover the meaning behind the nickname and what it reveals about his political image, strategy, and legacy. In Cameroonian politics, colorful nicknames often emerge to describe strong personalities. One of the most intriguing is the phrase some citizens have used to describe Issa Tchiroma Bakary — “the good devil.” The label, both ironic and symbolic, reflects the complex relationship many Cameroonians have with him: admiration mixed with skepticism, respect alongside doubt. But what exactly does it mean, and why has it stuck to his name? A Man Between Two Worlds Issa Tchiroma Bakary has been part of Cameroon’s political landscape for decades. He has served as a minister under President Paul Biya in several portfolios — from Transport to Communication — and later founded his own political party, the Front pour la Démocratie et le Développement (FDD). Over the years, his ability to navigate between loyalty and opposition has fascinated and divided observers. For his critics, this adaptability makes him unpredictable. For his supporters, it shows political wisdom and survival instinct. This duality — seen as both cunning and constructive — is what some describe with the paradoxical label “the good devil.” The Meaning Behind the Nickname In local expression, the term “good devil” doesn’t necessarily mean evil. It often describes someone who is sharp, strategic, and fearless — a person you may not fully trust but whose intelligence and effectiveness you cannot deny. Applied to Issa Tchiroma, the name reflects his talent for staying relevant, reading the political winds, and negotiating power dynamics that others might not survive. In a system where political longevity is rare, Tchiroma’s staying power commands a strange kind of respect. A Master Communicator Tchiroma is known for his powerful rhetoric. As a long-time government spokesperson, he defended state policies with passion, often facing harsh public criticism. Yet even his opponents acknowledge his eloquence and command of the media. This ability to speak convincingly on difficult issues earned him both admiration and suspicion — admiration for his intellect, and suspicion over whom he truly serves. Thus, “the good devil” can also symbolize the persuasive voice that can argue for either side with conviction. Reinvention and Political Relevance After decades within government ranks, Tchiroma’s declaration to run for president in 2025 marked another transformation. He now calls himself the “candidate of transition,” promising reform and renewal. For some voters, this shows courage and timing. For others, it feels like another calculated move. Either way, he continues to defy political expectations — which fits perfectly with the image of the “good devil”: always one step ahead, never fully predictable. A Reflection of Cameroon’s Political Culture Ultimately, the nickname reveals as much about Cameroonian politics as it does about Tchiroma himself. In a country where political loyalty and opposition often blur, figures like him embody both sides of the equation — challenge and cooperation, continuity and change. “The good devil” is not a moral judgment but a metaphor for political complexity. It expresses how one man can be both admired and mistrusted, depending on where you stand. Conclusion Issa Tchiroma Bakary’s nickname captures the paradox of Cameroonian politics: leaders seen as both problem and solution, critics and insiders, devils and deliverers. Whether loved or questioned, his legacy continues to spark conversation — proving that in politics, perception can be just as powerful as policy.

Issa Tchiroma Bakary has emerged as one of the most-noticed figures in the lead up to Cameroon’s October 2025 presidential election. His candidacy draws attention, not least because of his long political history, his recent defection from government ranks, and his promises of change. Below are key reasons why many Cameroonians are rallying behind him. 1. Experience & Insider Knowledge Tchiroma Bakary is not a political newcomer. He has held several ministerial posts over decades — in Transport, Communication, Employment and Vocational Training. Africa Press Arabic+3Wikipedia+3africaradio.com+3 His long record gives him legitimacy: he understands the workings of government, state institutions, and policy implementation. For many voters, that means less risk of “amateur mistakes” compared to someone with no governance experience. Also, his history of serving under President Biya and then breaking away positions him as someone who knows the system from within and is now calling for reform. Wikipedia+3koaci.com+3africaradio.com+3 2. Promise of Change & Break from the Old Guard A major part of Tchiroma’s appeal is his message of change. He has emphasized that the “time of waiting is over,” called for the end of what he terms the “old system” and is putting forward reforms: revising the electoral code, introducing a two‐round presidential election, limiting mandates, and pushing for a more federal state structure. Africa Scorecard+3alwihdainfo.com+3Africa Press Arabic+3 His positioning as a “candidate of the transition” resonates with many who are frustrated with stagnation, corruption, youth unemployment, and perceptions that government has not delivered broadly. Africanews+3alwihdainfo.com+3Africa24 TV+3 3. Regional / Identity Roots, Strong Base in the North Tchiroma is from the North (Garoua). For many in that region, he is seen as one of their own: familiar, accessible, and connected. That matters in Cameroon, where regional, ethnic, and linguistic identities play strong roles in political loyalty. Wikipedia+3koaci.com+3Africanews+3 Furthermore, his renown and long presence in politics give him high name‐recognition; having held visible ministerial portfolios means many have seen him in media, in government, and maybe even recall past performance. koaci.com+3cameroon-tribune.cm+3Wikipedia+3 4. A Candidate of Unity & Broadening Opposition Appeal Another factor is that Tchiroma seems to be trying to build broader opposition coalitions. He has had to navigate criticism over being “too close” to the ruling party in the past, but his recent break from that alignment gives him a chance to appear more independent. Wikipedia+3africaradio.com+3koaci.com+3 His platform and speeches often emphasize national unity, inclusive governance, justice, reconciliation, and giving voice to those who feel excluded. That helps him appeal beyond his region or base. Africa Press Arabic+2Africanews+2 5. Responding to Key Voter Grievances Many Cameroonians are discontented with persistent issues: unemployment (especially among youth), under‐investment in infrastructure, lack of transparency in governance, a sense of marginalization (especially in Anglophone regions and peripheries), and frustration over the durability of the current regime. Tchiroma’s promises — more vocational training, revising the electoral code, federal structures, more power to local/provincial authorities — directly address several of these pain points. Africa24 TV+2Africa Scorecard+2 His rhetoric of giving power back to the people (“le pouvoir au peuple”), and his expressed desire to transition power to a new generation, speak to voters who feel the leadership has grown distant or stagnant. koaci.com+1 Challenges / Doubts That Remain While his support is growing, there are also areas where voters are cautious: questions about how genuine his break from past alliances is, how much change is feasible within the current political and institutional constraints, concerns about whether promises can be fulfilled, and issues of credibility given long service in the old regime. Some critics also view his age and long tenure as part of the same “old guard,” which could limit the appeal of his message of renewal. Le 360 Afrique+2africaradio.com+2 Conclusion Issa Tchiroma Bakary is attracting support because he uniquely bridges two things: experience and insider knowledge, plus a growing promise of change. He knows the system deeply, yet is positioning himself as a reformer who can channel the frustrations of many Cameroonians. Whether he can convert that potential into electoral victory will depend on how well he addresses concerns about credibility, implements his reform agenda, and builds a sufficiently broad coalition across regional, linguistic, and generational divides.

Tens of thousands turned out for Issa Tchiroma Bakary’s Douala rally. Here’s a summary of what was said, done, and what it means for the 2025 presidential race in Cameroon. On Sunday, October 5, 2025, Issa Tchiroma Bakary, presidential candidate and leader of the Front for the National Salvation of Cameroon (FSNC), held a major campaign rally in Douala, drawing large crowds and making bold promises. Here’s what we know about that meeting — its atmosphere, messages, and potential impact. Massive Turnout, Tested Patience Key Messages and Promises Political Context & Reactions What To Watch Going Forward Conclusion Issa Tchiroma’s meeting in Douala was less about policy detail and more about making a statement: that he is a serious contender, that there is popular appetite for change, and that demands for electoral transparency are growing louder. With the presidential election scheduled for October 12, this rally could be a key inflection point — provided the energy seen in Douala is maintained, translated into votes, and that the process remains fair.

Cameroon’s elections management body, Elecam, has released the official list of polling stations ahead of the presidential election, enabling voters to confirm where they will cast their ballots. Elecam Takes Key Step Ahead of Presidential Election As Cameroon prepares for its upcoming presidential election, the country’s elections management body, Elections Cameroon (Elecam), has announced that the official list of polling stations is now available to the public. This move marks a significant step toward ensuring transparency and accessibility in the electoral process. The publication allows citizens to know exactly where they will vote, reducing confusion and delays on election day. Elecam emphasized that every registered voter should check their designated polling station to avoid last-minute challenges. Importance of the Announcement With elections often attracting millions of voters across Cameroon, clarity on polling locations is essential. Elecam’s decision to publish the list early is aimed at: This announcement is expected to ease voter participation and prevent logistical problems that have previously hampered election day operations. Where to Access the Polling Station List According to Elecam, the list of polling stations has been made available through several channels to ensure maximum accessibility. Citizens can: This multi-channel approach reflects Elecam’s effort to reach both urban and rural voters, ensuring that no citizen is left uninformed. Public Reactions The publication of the list has been met with mixed reactions. While many citizens appreciate the effort to increase transparency, others remain concerned about whether the information will reach remote communities effectively. Civil society groups and political parties have urged Elecam to intensify public awareness campaigns, particularly in rural areas where access to digital platforms is limited. The Road Ahead As the presidential election draws closer, Elecam continues to face the dual challenge of ensuring credibility and building trust among voters. The release of the polling station list is a positive step, but much more remains to be done to reassure citizens that the elections will be free, fair, and transparent. For Cameroonians, having access to accurate information about where to vote is crucial. It empowers citizens to exercise their democratic rights and strengthens the legitimacy of the electoral process. 📌 Conclusion:Elecam’s decision to make the list of polling stations available marks a concrete step toward better election organization. Now, the focus turns to ensuring that all citizens—whether in major cities or remote villages—can access this information and fully participate in shaping the future of Cameroon.

Cameroonian President Paul Biya pledges to intensify the fight against corruption and the misuse of public funds, reaffirming his commitment to accountability and good governance. A Renewed Promise from the Head of State President Paul Biya has once again emphasized his determination to fight corruption and protect public property in Cameroon. In a recent statement, the Head of State declared that he would raise the level of the battle against corruption and the misuse of state resources, sending a strong message to both government officials and citizens. Corruption has long been a concern in Cameroon, often cited as one of the major obstacles to development and public trust. By making this declaration, Biya seeks to reassure Cameroonians of his government’s commitment to good governance. Corruption: A Persistent Challenge Despite numerous anti-corruption campaigns and the creation of oversight institutions such as CONAC (National Anti-Corruption Commission), corruption continues to erode public confidence. Cases of embezzlement, mismanagement of funds, and abuse of office have frequently made headlines. The misuse of public resources not only slows down economic growth but also deprives citizens of essential services like education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Biya’s Commitment to Accountability Paul Biya’s statement reflects a call for accountability at all levels of government. By promising to intensify the fight, the President highlights the need for stronger mechanisms to track public spending, punish offenders, and prevent future abuses. Key measures could include: Mixed Reactions from the Public While some citizens welcomed the President’s declaration, others remain skeptical. Critics argue that similar promises have been made in the past with limited results. They insist that what Cameroonians need now are tangible actions rather than words. Civil society organizations have also called for greater independence of anti-corruption bodies and protection for whistleblowers, arguing that without these safeguards, efforts will remain ineffective. Looking Ahead The fight against corruption is critical for Cameroon’s future. If Paul Biya’s renewed pledge translates into concrete reforms, the country could witness significant improvements in governance, economic growth, and public trust. However, much will depend on political will, enforcement of the law, and the ability to hold even high-ranking officials accountable. For now, Cameroonians are watching closely, hopeful that this declaration marks the beginning of a stronger, more transparent era.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has once again stepped into the Middle East spotlight, this time by setting a strict deadline for Hamas to respond to his proposed Gaza peace plan. The move has reignited debates over Washington’s role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and raised questions about whether Trump’s approach can deliver what decades of diplomacy have failed to achieve. Trump’s Bold Move Trump’s peace plan, reportedly drafted with a mix of economic incentives and political compromises, seeks to halt the violence in Gaza while opening a pathway for long-term stability. But unlike traditional diplomacy, Trump’s style comes with a deadline. By giving Hamas a specific timeframe to respond, he has attempted to project both urgency and authority—qualities that defined his presidency. Critics argue that setting deadlines in such a volatile conflict could backfire, escalating tensions rather than easing them. However, Trump’s allies insist that a firm hand is exactly what is needed to force all parties to the table. A Return to High-Stakes Diplomacy Trump’s involvement is not entirely surprising. During his presidency, he spearheaded the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations. Supporters view this as proof that Trump knows how to deliver breakthrough deals in the Middle East. By re-entering the Gaza debate, he appears eager to reclaim his role as a dealmaker on the world stage. The question remains: will Hamas take the deadline seriously? For years, the group has rejected U.S.-led proposals, accusing Washington of favoring Israel. Trump’s firm deadline may be seen by Hamas as yet another attempt to pressure them without addressing what they consider core issues, such as sovereignty, territory, and the right of return for Palestinians. Pressure on Hamas and Beyond Trump’s deadline also places indirect pressure on regional players, including Egypt and Qatar, who have acted as mediators between Hamas and Israel. If Hamas fails to respond within the set time, these countries may face renewed diplomatic strain. Moreover, Israel’s government, already dealing with security challenges, will be closely watching Hamas’s reaction and how the U.S. positions itself if the deadline passes without progress. Risks and Opportunities While Trump’s approach could either push Hamas to engage or further entrench resistance, it undeniably shifts the conversation. By setting a clock on the peace process, he changes the dynamic from indefinite talks to a high-stakes decision point. This may appeal to international audiences frustrated with decades of stalemate, but it could also harden positions on both sides. Conclusion Donald Trump’s decision to set a deadline for Hamas to respond to his Gaza peace plan is a bold gamble that reflects his signature negotiation style—direct, time-sensitive, and high-pressure. Whether this will bring Hamas to the table or spark greater defiance remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that Trump has once again placed himself at the center of one of the world’s most complex conflicts, betting that his unconventional approach can succeed where others have failed.

In global politics, every word carries weight, and Russian President Vladimir Putin once again showed his mastery of rhetoric by delivering a speech on Ukraine’s “reunification” that sent ripples across Washington, Kyiv, and beyond. What many analysts are calling his “ultimate insult” to former U.S. President Donald Trump underscores not only Moscow’s confidence but also America’s waning influence in Eastern Europe. Putin’s Message: A Calculated Strike During his recent address, Putin framed Russia’s control over occupied Ukrainian territories as a historic “reunification,” invoking cultural, historical, and security justifications. While this narrative has been central to Russian propaganda since 2014, the timing and tone of the speech made headlines. What shocked many observers was Putin’s direct swipe at the U.S. leadership. By mocking Washington’s “failed promises” and pointing to Trump’s inability to stop NATO’s decline or secure long-term peace deals in the region, Putin effectively placed Trump in the same category as his predecessors—leaders who talked tough but failed to alter Russia’s strategic calculus. The U.S. on the Defensive For years, America has sought to present itself as the guarantor of European stability. But the war in Ukraine has revealed limitations. Military aid has flowed, sanctions have been imposed, yet Moscow continues to hold ground. Putin’s words highlighted a harsh reality: U.S. strategies—whether under Biden, Trump, or Obama—have not stopped Russia’s advance. By referencing Trump directly, Putin not only discredited Washington’s past efforts but also tried to exploit internal U.S. political divisions ahead of the 2024 elections. His message to the world was clear: no matter who occupies the Oval Office, Russia is calling the shots in Ukraine. Zelensky Under Pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who has tirelessly campaigned for Western unity and aid, now faces a daunting challenge. Putin’s rhetoric places additional psychological pressure on Kyiv, signaling that Moscow sees Ukraine as a pawn in its broader confrontation with the West. Zelensky’s government reportedly views Putin’s comments as an attempt to fracture international solidarity and paint Ukraine as abandoned. The panic stems not only from Russia’s battlefield maneuvers but also from the fear that Western allies might eventually lose patience with a drawn-out conflict. A Symbolic Insult, A Strategic Play Calling it the “ultimate insult” to Trump may sound sensational, but it fits into Putin’s long game of undermining U.S. credibility. By dragging Trump’s name into the Ukraine narrative, he seeks to create confusion within American politics while reinforcing Russia’s domestic narrative of strength and inevitability. This is not merely about insulting Trump—it is about projecting power, showcasing defiance, and rewriting the global balance of authority. The U.S., despite its arsenal and alliances, appears unable to stop Russia’s trajectory. Conclusion Putin’s “reunification” speech serves as both a symbolic insult and a strategic declaration. It undermines Trump’s legacy, challenges U.S. credibility, and puts pressure on Zelensky at a critical moment. Whether the West can regroup and respond effectively remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Russia is no longer simply reacting—it is dictating the terms of the narrative.

Cameroonian President Paul Biya emphasized that his government’s mission remains unfinished as long as citizens continue to face hunger and poverty. A Strong Statement from the Head of State In a recent public address, President Paul Biya declared that his government’s mission cannot be considered complete while any Cameroonian still struggles to eat or live in dignity. His statement highlights the ongoing challenges of poverty and food insecurity in the country, while reaffirming his commitment to improving the living standards of citizens. Hunger as a National Priority The President’s remarks shed light on one of Cameroon’s most pressing issues: food security. Despite economic progress in some sectors, many families still face difficulties accessing affordable and nutritious food. Rural areas in particular remain vulnerable, with agriculture struggling under the weight of climate change, poor infrastructure, and limited investment. By stating that “as long as a Cameroonian goes hungry, our task is not finished,” Paul Biya placed food security at the center of his national development agenda. Government Efforts and Challenges Over the years, the Cameroonian government has launched various programs aimed at boosting agricultural production, supporting small farmers, and improving infrastructure to connect rural producers with urban markets. Initiatives to promote local industries and reduce food imports have also been introduced. However, corruption, insecurity in some regions, and global economic instability continue to undermine these efforts. Rising prices for basic goods have made life increasingly difficult for ordinary citizens, sparking debates about whether enough is being done to protect the most vulnerable populations. Reactions from Citizens and Observers President Biya’s statement has drawn mixed reactions. Some citizens welcomed his words as a sign that the government recognizes the urgent need to fight hunger and poverty. Others, however, remain skeptical, pointing to decades of unfulfilled promises and the widening gap between the political elite and ordinary people. Civil society organizations have urged the government to back up these declarations with concrete actions, including increased investment in agriculture, stronger social safety nets, and better governance. Looking Ahead The fight against hunger and poverty remains one of Cameroon’s greatest challenges. If the President’s words are matched by bold reforms and effective policies, the country could make meaningful progress toward ensuring that every Cameroonian has access to food, education, and economic opportunities. For now, the message is clear: the government’s mission is far from over, and the well-being of citizens must remain at the heart of national priorities.

In a historic ruling, former Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) President Joseph Kabila has been sentenced to death for war crimes. Here’s what the judgment means for Congolese politics and justice. A Historic Verdict In a decision that has sent shockwaves across Africa and beyond, former President of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Joseph Kabila, has been sentenced to death for war crimes. The ruling, delivered by a Congolese court, marks an unprecedented moment in the country’s judicial and political history. Joseph Kabila, who ruled the DRC from 2001 to 2019, has long been accused of overseeing widespread human rights violations, including atrocities committed during armed conflicts in the eastern part of the country. The court found him guilty of crimes against humanity and war crimes linked to these violent episodes. The Charges Against Kabila The prosecution accused Kabila of bearing command responsibility for atrocities committed by both state forces and allied militias. Testimonies and reports detailed acts of mass killings, forced displacement of civilians, sexual violence, and the illegal exploitation of natural resources. International organizations and human rights defenders had for years documented these abuses, but this ruling marks the first time the former head of state has been held personally accountable in court. Political and Social Reactions The verdict has sparked mixed reactions within the DRC and internationally. Supporters of the ruling see it as a major step toward justice and accountability, particularly in a country where impunity for political elites has been the norm. Victims and their families have expressed relief that their suffering is finally being acknowledged by the courts. However, Kabila’s allies and loyalists have denounced the decision as politically motivated, accusing the current government of orchestrating a judicial witch-hunt. Protests have been reported in some parts of Kinshasa and Katanga, his political stronghold. Implications for Congolese Politics The sentencing of a former president is likely to have deep consequences for the DRC’s political landscape. It could strengthen the position of President Félix Tshisekedi, who has pledged to fight corruption and impunity, but it also risks further polarizing the political environment. On the international stage, the ruling may encourage stronger partnerships between the DRC and organizations advocating for justice and human rights. Yet, it also raises concerns about political stability, particularly if Kabila’s supporters escalate resistance. Conclusion The death sentence handed down to former President Joseph Kabila for war crimes is a watershed moment for the DRC. It highlights the growing demand for accountability and justice in a country long plagued by conflict, corruption, and impunity. Whether this decision leads to greater stability and reconciliation—or deeper political divisions—remains to be seen.